| File information: | |
| File name: | 5990-9430EN Surviving State Disruptions Caused by Test_ A Case Study - Article Reprint c20140730 [16 [preview 5990-9430EN Surviving State Disruptions Caused by Test A Case Study - Article Reprint c20140730 [16] |
| Size: | 3145 kB |
| Extension: | |
| Mfg: | Agilent |
| Model: | 5990-9430EN Surviving State Disruptions Caused by Test A Case Study - Article Reprint c20140730 [16 🔎 |
| Original: | 5990-9430EN Surviving State Disruptions Caused by Test A Case Study - Article Reprint c20140730 [16 🔎 |
| Descr: | Agilent 5990-9430EN Surviving State Disruptions Caused by Test_ A Case Study - Article Reprint c20140730 [16].pdf |
| Group: | Electronics > Other |
| Uploaded: | 29-05-2021 |
| User: | Anonymous |
| Multipart: | No multipart |
| Information about the files in archive: | ||
| Decompress result: | OK | |
| Extracted files: | 1 | |
File name 5990-9430EN Surviving State Disruptions Caused by Test_ A Case Study - Article Reprint c20140730 [16 Keysight Technologies Surviving State Disruptions Caused by Test: A Case Study Kenneth P. Parker, Keysight Technologies Shuichi Kameyama1, Fujitsu Limited David Dubberke, Intel Corporation 1. Also with Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan. Abstract The practice of initializing a board or system for testing purposes is not an exact science, but rather, pursued empirically and with an increasing risk of undesired side effects. It has been suspected that Boundary-Scan testing can cause such side effects. This paper provides a case study of such a board where a detailed root-cause analysis was performed. Some issues are identified that justify add- ing features to IEEE 1149.1 that will facilitate safe, fast and effective initializa- tion of a board or system, to get it ready for testing and to leave it in a safe state upon completion of testing. 1 Disclaimer There is a Working Group for IEEE 1149.1 that is revising the standard and could implement some of the ideas presented in this paper (see [IEEEWG]). The con- tent of this paper may not reflect the group's final thinking and results. Opinions stated throughout this paper are those of the authors. Copyright | ||

| Date | User | Rating | Comment |